Art and Design / ETR / Volume 2 / Issue 20 / DOI: 10.61369/ETR.9565
Cite this article
7
Citations
21
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ARTICLE

亲社会动机对大学生宽恕的影响机制研究

雅茹 李1 凌霄 张2
Show Less
1 1. 广东财经大学,广东 广州 510320, 1. 广东财经大学,广东 广州 510320
2 2. 广州华商职业学院,广东 广州 511300, 2. 广州华商职业学院,广东 广州 511300
ETR 2024 , 2(20), 50–52;
Published: 22 November 2024
© 2024 by the Author. Licensee Art and Design, USA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

本研究旨在探讨亲社会动机对大学生宽恕的影响以及观点采择和消极情绪在其中的中介和调节作用。使用亲社会动机量表、观点采择量表、消极情绪量表以及宽恕量表对477名大学生进行调查。结果发现:亲社会动机显著正向预测宽恕;观点采择在亲社会动机与宽恕间起中介作用;消极情绪在亲社会动机对大学生观点采择的影响中起调节作用。

Keywords
亲社会动机
消极情绪
观点采择
宽恕
动机性信息加工理论
References

[1] Aquino K, Tripp T M, Bies R J. Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and
avoidance in organizations[J].Journal of applied psychology, 2006, 91(3): 653.
[2] Wu Q, Chi P, Lin X, et al. Gratitude and satisfaction in romantic relationships: Roles of decisional forgiveness and emotional forgiveness[J].Current Psychology, 2022,
41(5): 2668-2676.
[3] Gao F, Li Y, Bai X. Forgiveness and subjective well-being: A meta-analysis review[J].Personality and Individual Differences, 2022, 186: 111350.
[4] De Dreu C K W, Weingart L R, Kwon S. Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: a meta-analytic review and test of two theories[J].Journal of personality
and social psychology, 2000, 78(5): 889-905.
[5] De Dreu C K W, Carnevale P J. Motivational bases of information processing and strategy in conflict and negotiation[J].Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,
2003, 35,235-291.
[6] Bolino M C, Grant A M. The bright side of being prosocial at work, and the dark side, too: A review and agenda for research on other-oriented motives, behavior, and
impact in organizations[J].Academy of Management Annals, 2016, 10(1): 599-670.
[7] Parker S K, Axtell C M. Seeing another viewpoint: Antecedents and outcomes of employee perspective taking[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(6): 1085-
1100.
[8] 张喆,贾明.下属逢迎行为何时有用? 亲社会动机和同理心的影响作用研究[J].管理工程学报,2016,30(01):26-33.
[9] 钟毅平,杨子鹿,范伟.自我— 他人重叠对助人行为的影响:观点采择的调节作用[J].心理学报,2015,47(08):1050-1057.
[10] 吴梦,白新文.动机性信息加工理论及其在工业与组织心理学中的应用[J].心理科学进展,2012,20(11):1889-1898.
[11] 顾远东,周文莉,彭纪生.消极情绪与员工创造力:组织认同、职业认同的调节效应研究[J].管理科学学报,2019,22(06):21-35.
[12]Watson D, Clark L A, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales[J].Journal of personality and social
psychology, 1988, 54(6): 1063-1070.
[13] Skarlicki D P, Folger R, Tesluk P. Personality as a moderator in the relationship between fairness and retaliation[J].Academy of management journal, 1999, 42(1):100-108.
[14] 王沛,王雪枫,陈庆伟.情绪对内隐刻板印象表达的调节[J].心理学报,2015,47(01):93-107.
[15] 卢俊婷,张喆,贾明.公仆型领导对员工组织公民行为影响的跨层次研究:一个有中介的调节模型[J].管理评论,2017,29(07):187-199.

Share
Back to top
Educational Theory and Research, Electronic ISSN: 2995-3456 Print ISSN: 2995-3448, Published by Art and Design