Art and Design / ETR / Volume 2 / Issue 15 / DOI: 10.61369/ETR.8914
Cite this article
1
Download
7
Citations
22
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ARTICLE

表现性评价设计与应用的研究分析
—— 基于WOS的系统性文献综述

风茹 赵 恩芹 徐
Show Less
1 聊城大学传媒技术学院, 聊城大学传媒技术学院
ETR 2024 , 2(15), 82–84;
Published: 18 October 2024
© 2024 by the Author(s). Licensee Art and Design, USA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

表现性评价作为一种超越传统标准化纸笔测试新型评价方法,受到了越来越多的关注。本文通过对Web of Science中有关表现性评价研究的文献分析,系统回顾了表现性评价的设计原则和应用范围呈现的规律。通过分析发现,国外表现性评价设计原则可以总结为:基于真实的任务或课堂情景、利用数字化平台,针对个人作业或者小组合作的作品,评价研究对象的情感能力与素质,应用范围多集中在教育领域。

Keywords
表现性评价,系统性文献综述,核心素养
References

[1] 周文叶,毛玮洁.表现性评价:促进素养养成[J].全球教育展望,2022,51(05):94-105.
[2] 周文叶.论表现性评价在综合素质评价中的运用[J].全球教育展望,2020,(10):54-58.
[3]Darling-Hammond L,Adamson F.Beyond Basic Skills: The Role of Performance Assessment in Achieving 21st Century Standards of learning[M].California;Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education,2014:23-29.
[4] 王靖,崔鑫.如何支持与评价协作学习中的共享调节?—— 基于2007-2020 年国内外共享调节研究的系统性文献综述[J].远程教育杂志,2020,38(06):86-95.
[5]Kelly M P, Feistman R, Dodge E, et al. Exploring the dimensionality of self-perceived performance assessment literacy (PAL)[J].Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 2020, 32: 499-517.
[6]Stacey M, Talbot D, Buchanan J, et al. The development of an Australian teacher performance assessment: Lessons from the international literature[J].Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 2020, 48(5): 508-519.
[7]Wu M J, Huang C Y, Kao Y S, et al. Developing a professional performance evaluation system for pre-Service automobile repair vocational high school teachers in Taiwan[J].Sustainability, 2018, 10(10): 3537.
[8]Al-Kuwari M M, Al-Fagih L, Koç M. Asking the right questions for sustainable development goals: Performance assessment approaches for the Qatar education system[J].Sustainability, 2021, 13(7): 3883.
[9]Cadez S, Dimovski V, Zaman Groff M. Research, teaching and performance evaluation in academia: the salience of quality[J].Studies in Higher Education, 2017, 42(8):1455-1473.
[10]Aisharif N Z, Roche V F, Ogunbadeniyi A M, et al. Evaluation of performance and learning parity between campus-based and web-based medicinal chemistry courses[J].American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 2005, 69(2).
[11]Anastasi J S. Full-semester and abbreviated summer courses: An evaluation of student performance[J].Teaching of Psychology, 2007, 34(1): 19-22.
[12]Newhouse C P. Using IT to assess IT: Towards greater authenticity in summative performance assessment[J].Computers & Education, 2011, 56(2): 388-402.
[13]Englund H, Frostenson M. Managing performance evaluation uncertainties in schools: When teachers become struggling performers[J].European educational research journal, 2017, 16(6): 885-906.
[14]Jacob B A, Lefgren L. Can principals identify effective teachers? Evidence on subjective performance evaluation in education[J].Journal of labor Economics, 2008,26(1): 101-136.
[15]CADEZ S, DIMOVSKI V, GROFF M Z. Research, teaching and performance evaluation in academia: the salience of quality[J].STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION,2017, 42(8): 1455-1473.

Share
Back to top
Educational Theory and Research, Electronic ISSN: 2995-3456 Print ISSN: 2995-3448, Published by Art and Design