ARTICLE

Volume 3,Issue 9

Cite this article
1
Download
9
Citations
40
Views
20 June 2025

统计学与“学生读PPT”

超 多1
Show Less
1 大连财经学院, 中国
EDTR 2025 , 3(6), 70–72; https://doi.org/10.61369/EDTR.2025060019
© 2025 by the Author(s). Licensee Art and Design, USA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

在高校课堂教学中,“教师读PPT”通常视为教学设计的反面教材。然而,若将“读”的主体从教师转向学生,课堂教学将会发生什么变化?尤其在统计学这类逻辑性强、符号密集、概念晦涩、抽象度高以及认知负荷颇高的课程中,学生朗读PPT上的内容,并随着课程学时的增加教师在学生读后辅以对应的问题,这究竟是无效课堂互动,还是一条通往深度学习的路径?让学生读PPT是否真得有意义?本文将从教育学、心理学、课堂互动理论和统计学教学实践出发,探讨学生“读PPT”行为在统计学教学中的潜在价值,并提出可持续的教学策略。

Keywords
PPT
统计学
课程设计
课堂互动
References

[1] Vygotsky L S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978.
[2] Mayer R E. Multimedia Learning[M]. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, 2009.
[3] Chi M T H, Bassok M, Lewis M W, et al. Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems[J]. Cognitive Science, 1994, 18(3): 439-
477.
[4] 李曼丽, 张羽. 大学生课堂沉默的影响因素及其干预策略[J].高等教育研究,2021,42(3):85-92.
[5] Cazden C B. Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning[M]. 2nd ed. Portsmouth: Heinemann, 2001.
[6] Lave J, Wenger E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
[7] Kalyuga S. Interactive distance education: A cognitive load perspective[J]. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 2012, 24(3): 182-208.
[8] Roediger H L, McDermott K B. Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1995, 21(4): 803-814.
[9] Biggs J. Teaching for Quality Learning at University[M]. 4th ed. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education, 2011.

Share
Back to top