ARTICLE

Volume 3,Issue 9

Cite this article
5
Download
7
Citations
38
Views
20 October 2025

富血小板血浆联合MEEK植皮技术在大面积烧伤中的临床应用

昕 李1 振中 巩1 金松 李1 斌 牟1
Show Less
1 黑龙江省哈尔滨市第五医院, 中国
MRP 2025 , 3(10), 14–17; https://doi.org/10.61369/MRP.2025100010
© 2025 by the Author. Licensee Art and Design, USA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

目的:探讨富血小板血浆在大面积烧伤病人中联合MEEK植皮技术与单独应用MEEK植皮技术修复创面速度效果对比分析。方法:2024年1月-2025年7月,哈尔滨市第五医院烧伤科收治6例符合盒入选标准的大面积病人,其中男患者5例,女患者1例,年龄在年龄18岁至60岁之间,烧伤总面积50%≤TBSA≤90%,深Ⅱ°~Ⅲ°烧伤,无吸入性损伤、无基础性疾病。致伤原因为热力烧伤,伤后24小时内入院,伤后3-6天有手术适应证。    排除重度基础性疾病及中重度贫血患者,随机将患肢分为Meek植皮+PRP组和单纯Meek植皮组;术后6d、8d、10    d分次换药,观察MEEK微型皮片成活和融合情况,术后10    d,对2组行MEEK微型皮片移植区域统计计算算皮片成活率。术后10    天,在实验区域及对照区域对称部位取成活皮片基底组织,进行微血管计数。术后6天、8天    、10天换药见6天时实验组与对照组创面均较湿润,分泌物相当,10天时实验组创面明显干燥,对照组仍略有湿润,有少量分泌物,去除双绉纱见实验组明显融合成片,皮片融合率(85±4)%(t=3.622,p<0.01),微血管分部密集,对照组虽已部分融合明显较实验组少,皮片融合率(78±5)%,(t=4.212    p<0.01)微血管分布散在,分泌物略多。结果:富血小板血浆联合MEEK植皮技术较单纯应用MEEK植皮技术在大面积烧伤病人创面修复中愈合速度更快,可缩短病程,提高重病人治愈率。

Keywords
Meek植皮
富血小板血浆
大面积烧伤
References

 [1] Quintero EC, Machado J,Robies R. Meek micrografting history, indications,technique,physiology and experience: a review article[J]. J Wound Care, 2018,27[Suppl 2]: S12-18. 
 [2] Rijpma D, Claes K, Hoeksema H, et al. The Meek micrograft technique for burns; review on its outcomes: searching for the superior skin grafting technique [J]. Burns, 2022,48[6]: 1287-1300.
 [3] Zuo KJ, Medina A, Tredget EE. Important developments in burn care[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2017,139[1]:120e-138e.
 [4]邓雪.不同浓度自体富血小板血浆治疗慢性难于创面的临床效果研究[J].中国全科医学,2021,24[Suppl 2]:S62-64.
 [5]胡建武,任继魁,孙晶洁,等.自体富血小板血浆联合负压封闭引流治疗糖尿病足溃疡的临床观察[J].中华烧伤杂志,2017,33[1]:46-48.
 [6] Kao YC, Lin DZ,Lee SL, et al. Assisted therapy with platelet-rich plasma for burn patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review[J]. Burns, 2022, 47[5]: 1012-1013.
 [7]狄海萍,牛希华,李强,等.Meek植皮在不同年龄段大面积深度烧伤患者中的应用效果[J].中华烧伤杂志,2017,33[3]:156-159.
 [8]张高飞,刘文军,王迪,等.微粒皮和Meek微型皮片移植修复大面积深度烧伤创面临床效果的荟萃分析[J].中华烧伤杂志,2020,36[7]:560-567.
 [9] Houschyar KS ,Ttapking C, Nietzschmann I,et al. Five years experience with meek grafting in the management of extensive burns in an adult burns center[J]. Plast Surg [Oakv], 2019, 27[1]: 44-48. 
 [10] Hu G, Zhang P, Chen Y, et al. Efficacy of two-stage Meek micrografting in patients with severe burns[J]. J Burn Care Res, 2022,43[5]:1081-1085. 
 [11] Lee SZ, Halim AS. Superior long term functional and scar outcome of Meek micrografting compared to conventional split thickness skin grafting in the management of burns[J].Burns,2019,45[6]:1386-1400.
 [12] Maruccia M, Tedeschi P, Corrao C, et al, Meek micro-skin grafting and acellular dermal matrix in pediatric patients: a novel approach to massive extravasation injury[J]. J Clin Med, 2013,12[14]
 [13] Fernandez-Moure JS, Van Eps JL, Cabrera FJ, et al. Platelet-rich plasma: a biomimetic approach to enhancement of surgical wound healing[J]. J Surg Res, 2017,207:33-44. 
 [14] Emer J. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP): current applications in dermatology[J].Skin Therapy Lett,2019,24(5):1-6.
 [15] Kazakos K, Lyras DN, Verettas D, et al. The use of autologous PRP gel as an aid in the management of acute trauma wounds[J]. Injury,2009,40(8):801-805. 

Share
Back to top