Volume 1,Issue 6
Fall 2025
《贝奥武甫》地理叙事研究：空间象征与文化秩序的文本建构
作为古英语文学的核心文本，《贝奥武甫》构建了中世纪欧洲最具复杂性的地理象征体系。这部史诗的语言形式虽根植于盎格鲁-撒克逊时期的英格兰，其叙事内核却折射出斯堪的纳维亚半岛的部族记忆，形成跨地域的文化层积现象。本文聚焦诗中三个关键战斗场景——象征权力中心的鹿厅、水陆交界的沼泽与封存记忆的土墓，通过文学地理学视角系统解析地理叙事如何参与早期日耳曼社会的文明建构。
[1] North, Richard. The Origins of Beowulf: From Vergil to Wiglaf. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
[2] Estes, Heide. Anglo-Saxon Literary Landscapes: Ecotheory and the Environmental Imagination. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2017.
[3] Tolkien, J. R. R. Beowulf: The Monsters and the Critics. London: Proceedings of the British Academy, 1936.
[4] Howe, Nicholas. Writing the Map of Anglo-Saxon England: Essays in Cultural Geography. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008.
[5] 王继辉.《贝奥武甫》中的罗瑟迦王与他所代表的王权理念[J].国外文学,1996(1):6.
[6] 张涛 .《贝奥武甫》:人物在空间中发展[J].安庆师范大学学报(社会科学版),2013,32(003):62-65.
[7] 陈雷 .鹿厅与中古时代的公共领域:试析《贝奥武甫》对社会起源的文学再现[J].上海交通大学学报：哲学社会科学版,2019(4):12.
[8] 王松林.船葬,鹿厅与《贝奥武甫》的丹麦属性[J].外国语言与文化,2022,6(4):1-10.
[9] Earl, James. Thinking about Beowulf. Stanford: Standford University Press, 1994.
[10] Niles, John D. Old English Literature in Context: Ten Essays. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2007.
[11] Klaeber, Friedrich. Klaeber’s Beowulf and The Fight at Finnsburg. 4th ed. Revised by R. D. Fulk, Robert E. Bjork, and John D. Niles. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008.
[12] Orchard, Andy. A Critical Companion to Beowulf. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2003.
[13] Douglas, Mary. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 2002.
[14] Williams, Howard. Death and Memory in Early Medieval Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2006.
[15] 刘乃银 .时间与空间:《贝奥武甫》的结构透视[J].国外文学,1995(2):6.