Volume 2,Issue 1
民用航空机长的管束权和空警的强制措施权的冲突与应对
现代社会大众乘坐飞机出行成为常态，航空业繁荣发展的同时带来机上治安案件激增，“机闹”行为时不时成为社会关注的焦点，此类行为给民航安全运营产生了负面影响。在机上处置此类案事件的过程中，机长的管束权和空警的行政强制措施权通常发挥着重要作用。民用航空国际安保公约和国内安保法规范对机长行使管束权做出相应规定。同时，空警作为行政执法力量，在机上处置“机闹”行为，依法行使强制措施。但是，由于两种权力的行使主体不同，法律渊源不同，权力边界差异性，使得各自在行使权力时难免产生冲突或者空白。分析现有法规范，依据相应的理论，以期找出管束权和强制措施权的法律边界，形成相应的协调机制。
[1]Abeyratne, R.I.R. (2020). Aviation Security and Public Safety: Perspectives on International Law. Journal of Air Law and Commerce, 85(4), 1012-1035.
[2]ICAO. (1963). Convention on Offences and Certain Other Acts Committed on Board Aircraft (Tokyo Convention).
[3]ICAO. (2014). Montréal Protocol 2014.
[4]Rocco, S., et al. (2022). The Role of Aircraft Captains in Managing In-Flight Security. Journal of International Air Law.
[5]《民用航空安全保卫条例》.
[6]《民用航空法》.
[7]ICAO. (2022). Annex 17: Security – Safeguarding International Civil Aviation Against Acts of Unlawful Interference.
[8]Price, J., & Forrest, J. (2021). Practical Aviation Security: Predicting and Preventing Future Threats. Butterworth-Heinemann.
[9]《治安管理处罚法》.
[10]Wang, H. (2021). Legal Gaps in the Enforcement of In-Flight Security Measures. Chinese Journal of Aviation Law.
[11]Abeyratne, R.I.R. (2022). The Future of Aviation Security: Reforming Airline Protocols. International Air Safety Review.
[12]Shawcross & Beaumont. (2020). Air Law: International Air Carrier Liability and Aviation Security. LexisNexis.
[13]Abeyratne, R.I.R. (2023). Legal and Policy Aspects of In-Flight Security Officers in Aviation Law. Air and Space Law Review, 48(2), 45-60.
[14]Price, J., & Forrest, J. (2021). Security Measures for Airline Personnel: International Challenges. Journal of Aviation Security.
[15]ICAO. (2022). Annual Safety Report.